Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder
Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.
Formalien[edit]
Nominierung[edit]
Leitsätze für die Nominierung[edit]
Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.
Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:
- Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
- Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
- Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
- Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
- Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
- Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
- Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
- Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
- nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
- Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
- schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.
Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.
- Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
- Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
- Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
- Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.
Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.
- Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
- Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
- Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
- Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
- Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
- Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
- Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
- Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
- Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
- Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.
Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.
Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen[edit]
Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.
Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.
Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.
Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein:
Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}
Abstimmung[edit]
Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:
- {{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
- {{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
- {{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
- {{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
- {{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
- {{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)
Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.
Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.
Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.
Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen[edit]
Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit
- {{Keep}} Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
- {{Delist}} Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).
Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:
In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:
- Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
- Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
- Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.
Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.
Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]
Allgemeine Regeln[edit]
- Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
- Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
- Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
- Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
- Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
- Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
oder durch Hinzufügen von{{withdraw}} ~~~~
. - Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
- Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
- Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
- Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
- Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
- Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
- Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.
Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl[edit]
Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:
- Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
- Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
- Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
- Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.
Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.
Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.
Vor allem sei freundlich[edit]
Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.
Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.
Siehe auch[edit]
- Zum Bearbeiten der Liste mit den Nominierungen klicke auf: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Eine chronologische Liste ist unter Commons:Featured pictures/chronological zu finden.
- Ein Archiv vergangener Nominierungen liegt unter Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.
- Eine Anleitung, wie man Nominierungen beendet, findet sich unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.
Inhaltsübersicht[edit]
Exzellenz-Kandidaten[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Platon- Samir Terkih.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 11:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question could the background be darkened a bit? --SHB2000 (talk) 12:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mosquée de Sidi Bou Médine03- SamirTerkih.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 11:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mount Shasta, Lake Siskiyou, SW view.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 04:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
- Info View from southwest across Lake Siskiyou to Mount Shasta, with the Wagon Creek footbridge on the left. Taken in mid-March 2024 during a photo excursion. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Breath-taking. Wolverine XI 09:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and majestic scene. – Aristeas (talk) 09:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support majestique --SHB2000 (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. —-Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Ottmar Mergenthaler, at approximately 45 years old.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 02:34:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info Unknown photographer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait of Mergenthaler; his Linotype machine was one of the most important and beneficent inventions of the 19th century. Question @Adam Cuerden There is something like posterization over his left (from the viewer: right) shoulder – small areas which are rather greenish, while the rest of the background is rather reddish. These areas are already in the original, but appear a bit more prominent in the restauration because the other defects have been removed. Can you do something about them or do you think they belong to the original print and hence should be kept? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Fixed. The original is good, but definitely had some oddities. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pose, high resolution, and very good restoration. --Yann (talk) 10:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:059 Baby baboon holding to its mother at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 23:30:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great Apes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Touching capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice moment. BigDom (talk) 08:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I remember viewing baby baboons on my last trip; they are just so cute! Wolverine XI 09:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, and cute! --Yann (talk) 10:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support aww, so wholesome. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 123.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 20:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco nominated by Yann
- Support Beautiful portrait. And Mona Lisa's smile. -- Yann (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree :) thank you, Yann Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Henri-Julien-Félix Rousseau, French - Carnival Evening - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 20:04:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
- Info Henri Rousseau, Carnival Evening, 1886 - uploaded by The Most Comfortable Chair - nominated by --Thi (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low-quality image. Wolverine XI 09:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question It looks like low quality, but normally the Google Art Project reproductions are accurate, so maybe this is just how the original painting is. Can somebody who personally knows the original or at least other paintings by Rousseau comment on the quality? – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, that's Rousseau's style. Yann (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Brazil 16thc map.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 17:16:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of South America
- Info Map of Brazil in the Miller Atlas of 1519. Created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Pedro Aguiar - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The map that was inserted in my school history/geography books. -- ★ 17:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and representative old map in excellent reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Historical map, very high resolution, good quality scan. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:PedroVilela Lagoa da Pampulha Belo Horizonte MG (40158074024) (cropped).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 17:15:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info Reclections of Mineirinho (left) and Mineirão (right) over Lake Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Created by MTur Destinos (Pedro Vilela) - initially uploaded by Rkieferbaum - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 17:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could the lighting be perhaps a tad less dull? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Schnepfau Steinbruch Schrägluftbild.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 15:14:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
- Info An aerial photo of a quarry might not seem like the most obvious subject for FP but I really like this picture. I think it is very well composed and I enjoy the interplay of light and shadows and the autumnal colours. created by Heimfoto - uploaded by Heimfoto - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- SupportI really like the composition of this photo. It has a grand sense of atmosphereAYAO32269 (talk) 05:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It’s a real achievement to create such a beautiful photo of a “boring” subject like a quarry. The season, the time of the day, the light and the composition are all optimal here. – Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 15:14:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info I know that there are some people in this photo but for some well attended churches it is probably impossible to avoid, anyway the photo is high resolution and very beautiful with the lovely light and detail at the altar. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I didn't recognize the image right away but thought, wow, that's a nice church! :) I uploaded a new version with some improvements (crop, sharpening, overexposure,...). Thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive church, good light and perspective. – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:MV Spirit of Vancouver Island.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 14:16:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
- Info: MV Spirit of Vancouver Island navigating Active Pass, British Columbia, Canada; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality but I'm unsure if this is FP light. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry but I consider this image a QI. Neither the lighting nor the sharpening nor the subject/compo are outstanding. In fact, I would say the subject is rather unspectacular Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with the above, this is a good capture but lacks 'wow' for FP. Needs a more spectacular backdrop, light and/or sky. BigDom (talk) 08:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough and the lighting is a problem. Wolverine XI 09:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Martha Annie Whiteley.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 12:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
- Info created by Claire_Gaudriot - uploaded by Claire_Gaudriot - nominated by Alacoolwiki -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite good, even if I would scan it in higher resolution. High educational value, as no free picture of this person is available. Yann (talk) 13:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not quality enough. Wolverine XI 14:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:MINUKKA, the feminine character of Kathakali.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 10:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Kathakali is a classical dance form of Kerala. It is a "story play" genre of art. Usually the feminine characters in Kathakali, which is called minukka, are being performed by men. This is a good example for men dress up in the female attire. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This should be cropped at the top, so that the eyes are a third of the picture (see my suggestion). Yann (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Slightly cropped. Keeping the proportion is important to me. Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition and upper crop isn't doing it for me. Wolverine XI 14:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cropped. Now please reconsider. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: a simple square crop of the original image looks best to me, and I would support it. If you want to preserve the proportions of the original, you can always upload a cropped version separately and propose it as an alternative here. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Now please see the changes. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much better! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine 11. Crop is still bad. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Young woman with a diadem from Buenos Aires, Argentina (9338285893).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 07:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
- Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice portrait, i though old photo from Asia. But i saw new, modern camera. Focus point should be on (her) right eye, while i see its on her (highligted) hairs in the back so left eye is a bit more focused. For older i would support, not for new where camera should do automatic eye-focus. Colors are nice. --Mile (talk) 08:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I gotta agree with Miles here, the eyes should have more focus. And for a picture from 2013, it is not exceptional. Wolverine XI 14:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 20:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Cirrus uncinus clouds in the morning sky.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 15:09:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Clouds
- Info created and uploaded by ADARSHluck - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi and welcome to the FPC. I've fixed up the file page a bit for you to match what it should contain for the FPC. Nice clouds, but the file name is a bit ambiguous and not describing the photo very well. This is a requirement here. It should be more specific, but changing a file name during a nomination should only be done by one of the regular FPC coders since it affects the whole procedure. Would you mind if I changed it to 'Cirrus uncinus clouds in the morning sky - D35 2227 01' and fixed things for you? Or do you have a better suggestion for a name. Best, --Cart (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your proposed name is good, but can you leave out the words after sky? The average person would have no clue what that is. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem. We just sometimes keep such numbers since they may be some sort of filing system the photographer uses and we respect such things, but for now I can skip them. I'll fix this right away. --Cart (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your proposed name is good, but can you leave out the words after sky? The average person would have no clue what that is. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @ADARSHluck and WildMouse76: Great shot, worth promoting! The cloud structure is fascinating and reminds me of the structure of ice flowers on glass. Unfortunately, the image contains a lot of noise and some chromatic aberrations. I took the liberty of removing the imperfections and providing it to you under the SwissTransfer link. If you like, you can use the file for an update. The improvements increase the chances of promotion, in my opinion. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect! I'll upload your modifications as soon as the download finishes. Thank you for your help! :) WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just realized I can't override it. I did some research and it seems that only autopatrolled users can override images. Can someone else do that for me? Thanks! WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect! I'll upload your modifications as soon as the download finishes. Thank you for your help! :) WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I've fixed that for you. When you ask nicely there is usually someone around to help you. Good luck with your nom now. :-) --Cart (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Special thanks to Cart for renaming and updating of the file, I just noticed it a moment ago. Otherwise I would have uploaded it tomorrow. Sincerest appreciation :) -- Radomianin (talk) 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I've fixed that for you. When you ask nicely there is usually someone around to help you. Good luck with your nom now. :-) --Cart (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A striking scene - the formations of the clouds remind me of ice flowers on a window pane. Great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice clouds. --Yann (talk) 07:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting cloudscape, welcome to FPC, WildMouse76! I hope you bring more images like this one here. --Kritzolina (talk) 12:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It looks like the clouds are trying to imitate the shapes of the trees (or vice versa). ★ 12:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically fine, but I don't see anything special. Wolverine XI 14:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual and interesting idea. Well done. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cart, Radomianin, Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mountain lake, Mylgval mountain cirque, Western Caucasus.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 12:33:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
- Info Ancient glacial erosion cirque with high-altitude mountain lake and rock formation on one side, Abishira-Akhuba Ridge, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value, nicely captured. I could imagine adding the image to more articles would be good – is there an article that describes "Rare, small-scale ancient glacial erosion cirques"? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is an article about cirques in general, but I’ll see if it can be added somewhere. --Argenberg (talk) 00:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thi (talk • contribs) 09:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great view, the shadow is not helping but what I had hoped a bit more of sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Saint Teresa of Avila Church, Bodega (2023)-L1003432.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 12:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very realistic, sculptural look; good light and quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 08:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Berberic painter, Ouarzazate, Morocco.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 08:00:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Berberic painter drawing a bookmark per my idea and drawing (scheme), Ouarzazate, Morocco. -- Mile (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question I have two questions: Isn't it 'Berber painter' and not 'Berberic painter', and what is the copyright status for the painting in the background and his other works shown in the photo? --Cart (talk) 16:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Cart Might be for 1st question, for 2nd, probably de minimis and not in the focus with minor crop too. Otherwise let me know what % of pic and other stuff for de minimis. As far as i know, goes "subjective". --Mile (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy image with no main subject, not to mention the bad crop. I don't think this image has what it takes to become featured. Wolverine XI 14:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe will be outvoted but I really like this. Slightly low image quality offset by interesting subject, wonderful colours, and a brave and challenging choice for the crop. Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nope, not this one, the lack of perspective correction, the crop, the soso quality, this isn't a FP to me, sorry Mile Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective and crop. --Thi (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Blanshard Peak viewed from Alouette Mountain.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 01:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
- Info: Blanshard Peak viewed from Alouette Mountain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unappealing gray sky and average light, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose light. --Thi (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The atmosphere is dull. Wolverine XI 14:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It may be a bit grey, but the composition is IMO really good, and grey/overcast is a worthwile mood in itself. Cmao20 (talk) 15:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 15:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile, sorry. --BigDom (talk) 08:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. Yann (talk) 10:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:026 Long-crested eagle at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 00:09:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Lophaetus
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Punky bird. ;o) Yann (talk) 09:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular! Wolverine XI 09:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool guy. – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Negro-Amazon confluence and Manaus (Brazil) from space.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 20:26:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#South America
- Info Confluence of the Rio Negro (dark) and the Solimões River to the Amazon River at Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, known as Meeting of Waters (Encontro das Águas, in Portuguese). Image captured on 7 February 2018 by ESA's Copernicus Sentinel-2. Created by ESA - uploaded by A11w1ss3nd - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty average and nothing worthwhile to say the least. Wolverine XI 15:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose ESA pictures like this are a dime a dozen. They are very useful but this one doesn't have anything particularly outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:A Zimbabwean Artisan Weaving His Story.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 20:23:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by NormanMapfuno - uploaded by NormanMapfuno - nominated by NormanMapfuno -- NormanMapfuno (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- NormanMapfuno (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Color noisy and unsharp. ★ 20:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per ★. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop. Wolverine XI 23:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Rose-ringed parakeets.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 16:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_Parrots)
- Info Rose-ringed parakeets on a branch in Harrow, London created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For featured picture candidate to succeed, the categories must be better provided. We need a category for the bird species, the location, and removing the too broad ones. Yann (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've just fixed it. Thanks for the advice. Daftation (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. Some of the birds are not as sharp as others but at this resolution I can forgive it. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really painterly and atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sacred Lotus in a Pond 2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 16:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nelumbonaceae
- Info Sacred Lotus in a pond in Shanghai, China created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Idem above. For featured picture candidate to succeed, the categories must be better provided. We need a category for the flower species, the location, and removing the too broad ones. Yann (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed this one also. Thanks again! Daftation (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The flower on the left ruins the composition for me, sorry. Wolverine XI 23:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I agree with Wolverine Poco a poco (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think this works as an artistic rather than encylcopedic flower photo. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 174.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 08:51:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Girl of the Mundari tribe posing with a Ankole-Watusi cow in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question I fixed the link, but shouldn't be rather Sanga cattle? Or may be it should be Ankole? Yann (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- As far as I understood it, it would be right to assume that the breed is a mix o both, Ankole and Watusi, so I updated it. Sanga is a wider term that includes both and would be more generic. Poco a poco (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 22:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question I find the left and right crops very tight. It fills a bit caged. Do you have more space available? Yann (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yann: I uploaded a new version with a bit more of crop on both sides. Regarding the breed of cow, please, give me more time to investigate it, I was told they were all Watusi cows. That could be a general statement and I cannot say if it applies for sure to this examplar. Poco a poco (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, better. Yann (talk) 11:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Baumkronenweg Walderlebniszentrum Ziegelwies 06.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 09:10:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 07:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info Close up shot with a drone of the sculpture of the iconic Mexican Independence Monument. Created by ProtoplasmaKid - uploaded by ProtoplasmaKid - nominated by ProtoplasmaKid -- ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 07:23, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hola Iván, I see potential for FP but you need to fix at least 2 issues: the strong chroma noise (probably as the result of having lifted up the shadows) and the red halo around the sculpture. Poco a poco (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your help, Diego! I have fixed as much as possible now the chroma and removed the halo you mention. Hopefully this will improve. Regards, ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, I had expected improvements in the original picture, not a different one, but as they are pretty similar I have no problem with that. The noise level is good in the current version and I also prefer the POV/angle in this version. The halo is overcorrected so that you can see a grey halo around the statue but in the inner side with no saturation. I also agree with the lighting comments. I prefered the lighting of the original version and the WB too. I'd weak support if you fix the halo and brigthen it a bit Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hola Iván, I see potential for FP but you need to fix at least 2 issues: the strong chroma noise (probably as the result of having lifted up the shadows) and the red halo around the sculpture. Poco a poco (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy and distracting background. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support: background is impossible to avoid, but light could be better. Still, impressive enough. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support, per Cosmonaut. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average at best. Composition and technicality could be better. Wolverine XI 15:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I think this was a really good try but I'm not sure the light was particularly kind to you. Keep trying though, good effort for (I think) your first nomination Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I think the buildings behind them are quite disturbing to the sculptures.Jiyoon Leee (talk) 04:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Just an average picture with unacceptably distracting background Chepry (talk) 09:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bamboo Hookah at khagrachori 03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 06:21:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
- Info created by Wasiul Bahar - nominated by Wasiul Bahar -- Wasiul Bahar (talk) 06:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment She isn't eating, is it? Please fix the description. Yann (talk) 08:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann thanks, done :-) Wasiul Bahar (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Lijsterbes (Sorbus). 31-03-2024 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 04:24:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
- Info New leaf from one Sorbus opens up. Focus stack of 14 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice off-center subject. Wolverine XI 23:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Paisaje silvestre del Nuevo Reino de Granada - AHG-restored.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 May 2024 at 23:21:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
- Info created by Jorge Juan Comendador de Aliaga and Antonio de Ulloa- scanned/uploaded by Jojagal - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:21, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question What is special in this artwork? Yann (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is a landscape of Colombia painted in 1748 Ezarateesteban 11:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO, there's nothing worthwhile. Wolverine XI 23:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is god, but resolution is just average. This could be a FP if it would have some special historical significance, otherwise it is only one among many. Yann (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Saint Patrick's Street Valletta (70394).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 May 2024 at 18:39:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Malta
- Info Triq San Patrizju in Valletta, Malta, facing the Basilica Our Lady of Mount Carmel. In the "snapshot of a normal residential street facing a major landmark" category of photo. :) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 18:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would decrease hightlights exposure. --Mile (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I took a pass at the highlights in the current version. Played with bringing them down lower, but it looked unnatural. I don't think there's that much detail lost, though -- just a bit bright in spots. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pic is good, just to make some more edits. You can send me original, CA is still strong and "blownout" can be corected. I would even crop it a bit above, church become biger. --Mile (talk) 09:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the offer! Where is the CA? Can you add a note? I'm not sure about a crop. I like the portrait orientation for narrow streets like this and wouldn't want to trim more off the sides to match a top crop. — Rhododendrites talk | 18:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Annoted. p.S. Crop would make, to strat from shadow to sun, now is sun-shadow-sun and church would be biger (would crop above too). Try as alternative. --Mile (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A warm and well composed streetscape Cmao20 (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I see what you where trying but the street and lit background overall aren't expectional to me. I believe that there are many other more interesting streets in Valetta with colourful balconies. Those shown here in the foreground are not. Sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful perspective on the dome of the Basilica, giving an atmospheric impression of the steep streets. – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 64.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 May 2024 at 06:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Children
- Info Mundari child in a cattle camp near Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light, touching portrait -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the look. Wolverine XI 23:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. Cmao20 (talk) 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I know that I am retired indefinitely from FPC, but this photo is too incredible --Wilfredor (talk) 21:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Varejao 2014.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 May 2024 at 20:01:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Other team sports
- Info My fellow Colatina-born famous basketball player Anderson Varejão as a member of the Cleveland Cavaliers team competing for a hoop with Washington Wizards' Marcin Gortat in 2014. Created by Keith Allison - uploaded by Baloncesto Puerto Rico - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A little unsharp/unfocused, but still a very good sport action composition. -- ★ 20:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The image is of high quality, clearly showing the physical movements of two athletes, allowing one to feel the charm of sports. 등혜진 (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Blindness? ★ 13:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No idea why you would nominate a picture you admit is unsharp. Quality is not there for FP. The expressions are great and it could be a cool action shot but the blurry sign distracts me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tecacera pennigera con Branchiomma luctuosum.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 May 2024 at 08:06:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
- Info created & uploaded by Roberto Strafella – nominated by Ivar (talk) 08:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment f/25, on 60 mm and ISO 100 !? Result is visible. --Mile (talk) 08:48, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Depth of field could be better, but composition makes up for it Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Mile’s hint; but it’s so beautiful thanks to colours and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sundance Film Festival 2024 - Mitzi Akaha-104A3329.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 May 2024 at 19:42:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Appealing, compelling portrait shot! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 21:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good photo, but the right hand disturbs me --Llez (talk) 08:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose As Llez said, hands bother me, both. Also i would crop botom, above elbow. Aperture could be closed a bit. --Mile (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- By cropping it, you would lose that long elegant line that makes this portrait so special. There is a hint of John Singer Sargent to this. --Cart (talk) 09:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Could be, but is she modeling for wardrobe or this will be "her portrait" for Infobox or similar. Since is "Mitzi Akaha" is more about her face. --Mile (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- She is an actress appearing for the film Chaperon, in which she plays one of the leading roles, at a film festival. Actors and actresses use their whole body and their body-language as tools, they are not just "pretty faces". I don't see why a photo like this could not be in an infobox. On the other hand, it is not necessary for an FP to be the lead photo in an article. Most wikis use rather unflattering passport-style photos for that. Artistic photos of actors and singers can be used in articles, like this Valued image of Cohen (at least until he died and the en-wiki article went passport again).
- I've taken the liberty to update the info on the file page; most people (and search Bots!) don't read or follow the categories the photo is in, so it is good to have as much info as possible in the description slot. --Cart (talk) 12:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- For me, this image is much beter. On en.Wiki, yes, they will cut her to mugshot, because... I told them sometime that is not good. But they keep scissors sharp. Frankie, isnt that photo beter ?! Just clean some dust on her, for me thats FP. --Mile (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- She is probably doing her best for the cameraman in that photo, but for me, I had hoped that wiki portraits of women had evolved beyond that 50's pin-up-gesture with a woman holding her hands over/on her head, while giving the man behind the lens a sultry look. That gesture might be ok for actresses like Marilyn Monroe or Dita Von Teese who have made 'sexy' their trademark, but not otherwise. Try the same gesture with a man and see what you think of it. --Cart (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive and interesting portrait. Please don’t crop it, Commons is not a mugshot repository. IMHO also more interesting than the mentioned alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The placement of her hand bothers me. Wolverine XI 19:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, strange pose Poco a poco (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is the kind of portrait I would like to see more of on FP. Thanks for nominating it, Frank! And yes, I definitely prefer it to the mentioned alternative, which is just cliché and not a living image. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice portrait, and from her pose and look you can immediately tell she is a professional model/actress. The internet is full of diverse pictures of her from many domains: lifestyle, fashion, cinema, commercials, etc. This portrait is candid and stands on its own. Besides the perceived candor I feel a touch of flirting/teasing/playing, also some deliberately played shyness, in her eyes and smile, all in an elegant way. Overall, she is is elegantly playful here. --Argenberg (talk) 01:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Llez but the expression and colours are too good not to feature. Argenberg explains it well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dust storm, Amarillo, Texas, 8b27554a.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 6 May 2024 at 07:36:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1939
- Info created by Arthur Rothstein, restored by PawełMM and Yann, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support At first, I thought that the half-cut car and the pole in the middle make an odd composition. But the two poles give a sense of depth, and with the car and the running woman, they emphasis the on-going disaster. -- Yann (talk) 07:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting shot. My comment is mainly about the restoration, which seems only part done. Blending the large semicircle pattern seems to make it into the source of light -- is it, though? There's still a strip of that pattern along the top-left, some splotches throughout, and maybe light smudging from the cleanup. I do not envy you the task, though -- restoring an image with so much noise (or "noise" given it's a dust storm) would be challenging. — Rhododendrites talk | 11:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think I fixed that. Yann (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Pinging @Yann I tried my hand at the photograph: I reduced the noise moderately so as not to take away the natural grain of the image. I think it's much better now. I also removed all the remaining scratches and spots. However, PawełMM and you have already done a very good job :) You can find the edited version under the SwissTransfer link, which you are welcome to use for an update if you like the result. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The cropped car ruins it for me. Wolverine XI 19:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Made corection of "brush tool", more contionous colors. And beside first lamp on right side. I think is OK. --Mile (talk) 08:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and atmospheric photo. IMHO Radomianin’s version (linked above) would have been even better, but seems it got lost in discussion, so let’s feature this one. – Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Beyond the Black, European Co-Headline Tour, Ludwigsburg 2022 (13).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 18:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info created by Brackenheim - uploaded by Brackenheim - nominated by Tintenklecks -- Tintenklecks (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tintenklecks (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi and welcome to the FPC. Unfortunately, you have missed part of the rules about 'Alternatives': "Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.
- Please choose one of the images and run with that one. Best, --Cart (talk) 19:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done and thank you! --Tintenklecks (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I suggest cropping the top to make the composition more balanced. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- +1 Riad Salih (talk) 16:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for that suggestion! Is it okay like that? Brackenheim (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Better! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive performance, well captured; congrats. – Aristeas (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically not there. I can provide a list as to why, but I'll leave that out for now. Wolverine XI 19:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas. Thanks for the crop, Brackenheim. It is an improvement for the composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would also crop a few pixels at the bottom, but FP anyway. --Yann (talk) 09:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hericium americanum.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 15:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Order_:_Russulales
- Info: bear's head tooth fungus; no existing FPs. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Underexposed? Or bad light? Compare with this one. ★ 16:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: redeveloped and added an alternative. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps because of the scattered light, the photo has some cold tones, but it looks clear and the angle design is great. Jzhdylb (talk) 05:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info: slightly different angle and nicer bokeh --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I barely see any difference between the two versions. ★ 23:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry man, but the quality and lighting. Wolverine XI 19:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Oriental hanging lanterns. Souk Haddadine, Marrakech Medina, Morocco.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 15:52:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting_devices
- Info Oriental hanging lanterns. Souk Haddadine, Marrakech Medina. My shot. --Mile (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice shapes and colors. Yann (talk) 16:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yann makes a good point, but not with that crop on the right. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 11:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition could be better. Wolverine XI 19:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
* Support The composition is very delicate and beautiful Bai0926 (talk) 04:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Struck vote as invalid (user only has 29 edits). As per COM:FPC#Voting: only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." --SHB2000 (talk) 04:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. Great motif and good composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Ras El Afia, Jijel.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 18:36:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Algeria
- Info created by Mokhtarjet7 - uploaded by Mokhtarjet7 - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overblown lights. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like a photoshopped image. Wolverine XI 15:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is an interesting idea, but the rocks in the foreground are too dark. Some light there would make this a great image. Yann (talk) 09:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann there is also this version, what do you think? Riad Salih (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is even darker... Yann (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can attempt to adjust the brightness, although it might be challenging since we don't have the access to the raw files. Riad Salih (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, without the RAW, it will be very noisy. Yann (talk) 09:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- I can attempt to adjust the brightness, although it might be challenging since we don't have the access to the raw files. Riad Salih (talk) 11:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is even darker... Yann (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann there is also this version, what do you think? Riad Salih (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great mood but IMO way too overprocessed for FP, sorry. The contrast has been pumped up too high and the detail at full size is not great. Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:East Above Corniglia Cinque Terre crop Sep23 A7C 06797.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 13:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
- Info Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Corniglia perched on a 300 ft (91 m) cliff. View from Trail 587 about 260 m (850 ft) above the village. San Pietro Church in middle right. Zigzag staircase down to the railway station lower right. One of five coastal villages in Cinque Terre National Park (a UNESCO Heritage Site), Liguria, Italy -- Tagooty (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Woman playing cello during a concert in Moscow - Performance-2 (50774567563).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 3 May 2024 at 19:07:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Photo_art
- Info created by Tatiana El-Bakri - uploaded by Sintegrity - nominated by --Thi (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great portrait. Yann (talk) 21:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed --PierreSelim (talk) 10:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Any information on who this is? — Rhododendrites talk | 19:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- To clarify, I am leaning support, but for an interesting portrait of a specific person, not for a stock photo of a cellist. — Rhododendrites talk | 11:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm just as curious as you are, and I've tried to identify her by searching for concerts in Moscow on 13 December 2020 (or 12 or 14 since the camera might have been set to another time zone). No luck so far, but Russian pages are tricky for me. --Cart (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nelli Tsinman [1][2][3][4]. --Thi (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Great. Thanks. Support — Rhododendrites talk | 11:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nelli Tsinman [1][2][3][4]. --Thi (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm just as curious as you are, and I've tried to identify her by searching for concerts in Moscow on 13 December 2020 (or 12 or 14 since the camera might have been set to another time zone). No luck so far, but Russian pages are tricky for me. --Cart (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Obvious tilt -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- ...which is why it is nominated as 'Photo art'. It's not the first time, 1 & 2, we've had an FPC with a tilt for artistic reasons. The technique is called the Dutch angle. --Cart (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- In this case, not enough to create an effect, too much to get unnoticed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- There is no defined, absolute or minimum angle, it is up to the photographer who creates the image. --Cart (talk) 01:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There is no absolut truth, it is up to each reviewer who interprets the image. Here the lady seems to fall forwards because the distance is shorter at the top, in the direction she's looking at. Awkward lead room and opposite effect to the intended one, if there was. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- There is no defined, absolute or minimum angle, it is up to the photographer who creates the image. --Cart (talk) 01:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- In this case, not enough to create an effect, too much to get unnoticed -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- ...which is why it is nominated as 'Photo art'. It's not the first time, 1 & 2, we've had an FPC with a tilt for artistic reasons. The technique is called the Dutch angle. --Cart (talk) 19:35, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A good example of photo art, aesthetically pleasing. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 15:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seems like the processing went a bit too far. Wolverine XI 19:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Frank. Thanks to Thi for finding out the musicans' name. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, too much going on here, sorry. Quality could also be better for a 2020 shot Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting idea and good image quality but sorry, I'm just not sensitive to the mood here. It makes playing a cello look weirdly eerie. Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose overcomplicated/overprocessed even as for Photo art category Chepry (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)[edit]
Sun 28 Apr → Fri 03 May Mon 29 Apr → Sat 04 May Tue 30 Apr → Sun 05 May Wed 01 May → Mon 06 May Thu 02 May → Tue 07 May Fri 03 May → Wed 08 May
Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)[edit]
Tue 23 Apr → Fri 03 May Wed 24 Apr → Sat 04 May Thu 25 Apr → Sun 05 May Fri 26 Apr → Mon 06 May Sat 27 Apr → Tue 07 May Sun 28 Apr → Wed 08 May Mon 29 Apr → Thu 09 May Tue 30 Apr → Fri 10 May Wed 01 May → Sat 11 May Thu 02 May → Sun 12 May Fri 03 May → Mon 13 May